207

Vol.20 No.207, 2003
Message
to the Reader ![]() |
|
Dear Reader:
However, it was also a month of tensions and sorrows: |
Nobody, except for a handful of fanatics, know what happened and what will happen now. Some are hopeful: This marks the beginning of the end for the generals, as one reader exclaimed to us on 4 May. Some are not: The window on the dialogue strategy is gone, shut tight, as a prominent Shan mourned a day earlier. Most however are disorientated by these shocking events: Now we're at a loss what to do next, as many confided to S.H.A.N. and ask for advice. For which we have only one thing to say: We shall do our job, that is, investigate what took place and give you the facts. You make your own judgment. We are sure it will be the correct one. Mysoong! (Wishing You Progress & Prosperity)
|
|
|
Letters |
||
| Your ideas and assessments of S.H.A.N. reports are welcome. Apart from editing for lack of space and touching up on some words for clarification, we will gladly reproduce your letters in full. | |||
Shan refugees I read your article with great interest. Why have I never seen a proposal for how to deal with this? I asked several Shan leaders if they would like refugee camps or what, but they never responded. I understand it is difficult to deal with, but without any suggestions we can't do much from here. Editor's reply: One reason the politicians are reluctant to speak in favor of a camp is because most of them are Thai-based and hate to embarrass the host country. Another is in general Shans fare better than other groups as non-refugees because most of them can just mix in easily with the Thai community. The third reason given at a recent meeting was that Thais tend to think of Shan refugee affairs as Thai internal affairs and just want to keep it in the family. However not all Shans are able to mingle with the mainstream Thai society and they are the ones who should have a say instead of waiting for the politicians. The Shan community in Thailand has been asking for refugee camps for a long time. The original Thai policy for Shans worked well in the days when there were few refugees and the Thai economy was strong. It also worked for the elite who were assimilated. In talking about Shan refugees we have to emphasize that they are not 'fleeing fighting'. In other words, it is not a short-term problem. They will not return when the 'fighting' stops. That is the official Thai myth. They need to recognize that as long as Burma is ruled by an oppressive regime that brutalizes people, practise rape, forced labour, forced relocation and summary executions, people will continue to escape to Thailand irrespective of whether or not there is 'fighting'. So what is to be done with the refugees whose numbers will grow until there is a change of government in Burma. We also need to differentiate between the SSA and its dependents, migrant workers and refugees. The SSA and its dependents are a political matter which the Thai government |
has to deal with. It does not concern us as international NGOs. Refugees are a humanitarian matter that concerns the international community. Refugees who have no camps are forced to become migrant workers. The Thai economy can no longer absorb them and they are being exploited by unscrupulous employers (Thailand also needs minimum human rights standards for illegal migrant workers). Given the longer-term nature of the problem, we need refugee camps to provide minimum care for the Shan refugees like those services being provided by the BBC. Without camps, we cannot get international help for the refugees. This means the burden will fall on Thailand because the refugees will continue to come whether or not refugee camps are allowed. If Thailand allows camps, we can get international help to ease Thailand's burden.
A related problem is IDPs. There are more IDPs than refugees inside Burma's borders. If Thailand does not want refugees, they need to help change the government in Burma. Failing that, they need to allow cross-border assistance to IDP by the international community. Otherwise, as the SPDC becomes more repressive, more villagers will become IDPs, and more IDPs will become refugees in Thailand. Those are good points, thanks for sharing them with me. From our perspective in the U.S., we always want to do more to help the Shan people and others who don't have access to camps. If, for example, the Shan were to propose the creation of say-3 refugee camps for women and children only--we would fully support (and also lobby for funding for that). It would be a step in the right direction. Last year, we brought a Shan woman here who testified in the Congress and across the country--but when it came to this question--what should we do--there was little in the way of answers. I've also noticed that the refugee advocacy groups don't seem to be moving any proposals on this. I'm not an expert on refugees, but I wonder why they're not pushing the limits. Perhaps there is more that I do not know.
Anyway, thanks for your reply. |
||
| SARS a blessing? | They have depended so much on their Chinese and Asean masters for their life support. Thus, if their masters are sick with SARS that would hurt the generals and finally spell the doom of that regime. The generals' economy itself could become damaged beyond repair. Therefore, to all our people out there, don't give up hope, keep on fighting the enemy with each of our individual ways. Those with the rifles, fight with bullets. Those with pens, fight with ink.
This year might be the year of Victory!!! |
|
There is a TERRIBLE catastrophe going on in Asia now. The SARS epidemic. BUT, in every dark cloud, there is a silver lining. The silver lining is that this is the year that might be the beginning of the end of the generals. SARS could damage the ASEAN and Chinese economies so badly that their support of the generals could be greatly weakened. |
|
|
| Human Rights Refugees not job seekers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charting the Exodus from Shan State: Patterns of Shan refugee flow into northern Chiangmai province of Thailand (1997 - 2002), a recent report posted on Shan website <shanland.org/shrf/ Chartingtheexodus.pdf> and prepared by the Shan Human Rights Foundation, says most Shans arriving into Thailand in the past six years are genuine refugees and not job seekers as claimed by successive Thai governments. The report was based on interviews with 66,868 Shans arriving in Chiangmai's Fang, Chaiprakarn and Mae Ai districts. Prior to 1996, most arrivals would match the term job seekers, it says. The annual influx in Fang did not exceed 4,000. Most were adult men, who worked to save money and only a few of them chose to remain in the kingdom. However, beginning that year when the 3-year forced relocation drive was launched by Rangoon, the number of new arrivals began to surge between 8,000 - 15,000 each year. The number of men and women were almost equal and they brought in children and elderly people. Most of them are from the 13 townships where the populace had been uprooted by the Burmese army's scorched earth campaign and, are understandably reluctant to go back. "Unlike on the Karen and Karenni borders, there are no official refugee camps on the Shan border. As a result, Shan refugees have been forced to survive as migrant workers," it argues. |
The only Shan group that has been accepted as 'persons fleeing dangers from war' are the 400 men, women and children who have been sheltering in Chiangmai's Wianghaeng District since fighting broke out between the Shan rebels and the Burma in May 2002. The total number of arrivals in Thailand is estimated to have reached over 150,000 since 1996. Refugee number on the rise At the end of May, an aid worker in the Fang-Chaiprakarn-Mae Ai area reported the following statistics on the arrivals of refugees: |
Between January and March, the monthly figures averaged at 1,003. However, even with the recent ban on the outflow of migrants, the average number of arrivals has gone up to 1,369, an increase of 36.8% in April and May. This was due to three major causes, he explained: increased purchase of paddy from farmers, enlistment of new recruits for the Army in several townships and new forced relocations in some townships, especially Kunhing and Mongton. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHAN DIARY
May 2003
The World
Quake measuring 6.7 on open ended Richter scale kills 1,500 and injured 7,000 in Algiers. (Bangkok Post) International Relations 13 May 15 May Abdul Mutallib, a Burmese national in Karachi suspected of links to al-Qaeda, arrested. 16 May 30 May Thai-Burma relations 14 May 19 May 21 May 29 May
Politics 11 May |
11
May 30 May
Shans
Sao Mayari and Sao Kennari, daughters of Sao Kya Seng, Prince of Hsipaw, who disappeared after he was taken by the military in 1962, writes to Gen Than Shwe to "reveal to us what happened to our father" so they can "find peace of mind." (Irrawaddy)
20 May 21 May
Shan State Army celebrates 45th anniversary of the Resistance. (S.H.A.N)
Business /Economy
12 May
Human Rights
6 May
9 May
10 May |
12 May
46 suspected Sars patients have been treated in Rangoon since 8 April. (RFA)
13 May
17 May
19 May
27 May
28 May
Environment
Drugs 19 May
Certain elements that stand to lose from Bangkok's war on drugs are planning to take PM Thaksin's life, says a written warning from the US embassy. (The Nation)
War
21 May
22 May
24 May |
QUOTES
The Vesak or Visakha Day (today), (the day) that the Lord Buddha was born, became fully enlightened and passed away is actually about making efforts to understand who the Buddha was and what he did for the human world. His was an example of how a single person can change the world without political power and money but with compassion and wisdom, the two weapons that few can claim to possess.
I have come to the conclusion that the SPDC is not interested in national reconciliation. To
ignore the result of the 1990 elections is to have total disrespect for
the people and is also an insult to the people. |
Burma would have been much better off, if the British would have said that Burma is the Irrawaddy Delta and that's it.
Secession
A citizen who leaves the state permanently or who acquires the citizenship or registers himself as a citizen of another country, or who takes out a passport or a similar certificate of another country ceases to be a citizen. |
| Politics Shan politician released under unresolved circumstances |
Seven of them were given life sentences while the rest received 5-13 years. Sai Nood, whom junta officials claimed as being responsible for typing out an anti-government pamphlet, however, was set free. "They went to jail not because of my 'confession'," he explained. "They themselves admitted (that they did it) at the court." There was no news of intervention by the generals whose mediation might have settled the matter. Apparently, they did not see the need to. |
|
Sai Nood a.k.a Sai Nyunt Lwin, officially the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy's joint secretary #1 as Rangoon wanted to keep the office of general secretary vacant since the resignation of Sai Ai Pao five years ago, was released without pomp and fanfare on 20 May. Although Sai Nood stated that he was freed unconditionally on the receipt of a |
joint request by SNLD led by Khun Toon Oo, Shan State Army "North" of Loi Mao and Shan State National Army of Gunyawd to the State Peace and Development Council, it appeared that some bad feelings had persisted among its allies, according to the DVB. "I am being shot at with air guns" he said, "(by some NLD members who alleged that) I was released because I became the government's witness (against 11 NLD members who were arrested at the same time in February)." |
|
| ICG suggestion to non-Burmans: Find common ground and refrain from choosing sides |
with ethnic political parties, the paper recommends that representatives be chosen "from as broad a cross section of their communities as possible, and minimally including all groups and interests that have the power to disrupt the process of reconciliation." |
|
The latest paper, 7th in the series on Burma, by the Brussels-based International Crisis Group (ICG) that was released on 7 May, has counseled the "ethnic minority" organizations to work together for a common agenda and refrain from taking sides between the military and the NLD. |
The report also cautions the ethnic organizations of the need to maintain their independence from the main Burman groups. "Given the depth of antagonisms and confrontation between the military government and the
NLD, any attempt to choose sides is likely to create tensions and limit their ability to work for specific minority interests. This would outweigh any short-term material or other gains from siding with a more powerful patron in (Rangoon)." |
|
| Tachilek explosions - who did it? | ||
On 21 May, 4 bomb blasts rocked the city opposite Thailand's Mae Sai that left 4 dead, including two police officers, and wrecked the statue of the revered King Bayintnaung. The next day, a train of 9 oil tankers bound for Kengtung in the north was ambushed on the way by an unidentified armed group that left 3 dead, 3 tankers burned and 3 overturned. The two incidents followed a prior explosion in Pyu, a town near Rangoon, on 15 May, that left 1 moviegoer dead and 47 others injured (for which the Karen National Union, to no one's surprise, was blamed.) By the end of the month, the smoke had cleared. But still no one, except for those who did it, was able to come up with definite answers for the questions: who was responsible and why. The suspects, not in order, were sketched out by Thai security officials as follows, each of whom has a well-founded "score to settle":
|
|
Some border watchers noted that Burmese behavior towards Thailand had almost made a complete about turn. "In the past, the Burmese were predictable. Suppose there as an attack along the border, first they would accuse us of supporting the rebels and close down the border. We would ask what's going on and they would reply there was no official sanction from Rangoon to tell us anything," explained another. "But this time, no blame has been attached to us and despite our businessmen's initial concern, the border has not been closed. Besides, they were volunteering information without even waiting for our request." "They may have changed the rules of the game," remarked another officer in Chiangmai. "And that is enough reason for us to keep our eyes open." |
|
|
||














