Ethnic leaders dismayed by experts’ dismissal
Ethnic ceasefire leaders say they are disappointed with “blanket rejection” by Burma experts about the ruling military leaders’ nuclear aims.
4
December 2008
“Maybe we don’t know what to look for,” admitted a Shan ceasefire officer to
SHAN. “But our reports about the generals’ ambition to possess nuclear bombs
were nothing less than the truth.”
He pointed out to earlier reports about the junta’s planned move to Naypyitaw a
year before its official announcement to transfer the capital there in late
2005. “Nobody believed us then,” he recalled. “But then it came like a
bombshell. The next time it’s going to be a nuclear one, if they choose to keep
ignoring our reports.”
One of
his arguments is the junta leaders’ rejection of the ceasefire groups’
recommendation, during the 2004-07 Constitutional Convention, that the nuclear
programme be placed under the Energy Sector instead of the Defense Sector in
the draft charter. “We explained that putting it under the defense sector would
be contrary to our long-standing claim that we wanted to develop nuclear power
for peaceful purposes,” he said. “But the generals merely shrugged it off.”
“Isn’t it enough evidence of what they are aiming for?” he asked rhetorically.
Under the Union Defense and Security Sector (P.181) in the newly
approved Burma’s constitution is (d) Atomic energy, nuclear fuel and
radiation and mineral resources essential to its production, whereas its Energy,
Electricity, Mining and Forestry Sector (P.183) says nothing about it.
The nuclear programme, according to sources, is being headed by Lt-Col (ret) U
Thaung, Minister of Science and Technology, who has his office at Maha Myaing
camp, Thabeikkyin township, north of Mandalay.
“About 20 foreigners are often seen there,” said a trader, a long-time SHAN
source.
“Please ask the experts to tell us what they need to know (to confirm the
existence of the nuclear programme) instead of brushing our reports aside,” he
concluded. “And we will get it for them.”


